The Outcome of the Follow-Up of Consolidations on Chest Radiographs in a Maltese Population, Presenting from the Community, Aged 50 or over – a Retrospective Study.
Abstract
Background: The British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) suggest a repeat chest radiograph 6 weeks after treatment for patients over the age of 50 to screen for lung malignancy. The benefit of thispractice is not well determined.
Method: We conducted a retrospective study involving patients from the community over 50 years old with consolidations on chest radiography. These patients presented in Mater Dei Hospital, Gozo General Hospital and Maltese Health Centres during the months of January 2013-2017 and August 2013-2016.
The occurrence of follow-up imaging and subsequent diagnosis of lung malignancy was documented. All chest radiographs were reviewed by a radiologist.
Results: 402 patients met our inclusion criteria. Follow-up imaging was done in 214 patients (53.2%) within 12 weeks. There was no statistical significance in the follow-up rates when matched for the presenting month, whether radiologists recommended repeat imaging, whether patients were admitted to hospital, and for the patients’ age and gender.
The diagnostic yield of lung malignancy was 1.74% (7 patients) within 12 weeks with all malignancies being at an advanced stage at diagnosis (lowest stage being IIIA) when detected. All seven patients had a smoking history.
Conclusion: 53.2% of community-acquired pneumonia patients over the age of 50 had follow-up imaging within 12 weeks. No clinical variables explaining this low rate could be identified.
This practice results in a low diagnostic yield. Moreover, the diagnosis of lung malignancy is achieved at an advanced stage, making it a poor screening tool.
Scheduling repeat imaging in patients diagnosed with community acquired pneumonias (CAPs) with a consolidation on radiographs is routine practice for many a physician. Lung malignancies can have similar radiological features to that of a consolidation, while an airspace shadow caused by an infection can easily mask an underlying neoplasm. It is on this trail of thought that repeat imaging is routinely done within the first 2 to 3 months. The 2009 British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines1 on Community Acquired Pneumonias mention that repeat chest radiography should be performed 6 weeks after the initial chest X-ray in patients over the age of 50 or those with a smoking history. Similarly, the 2005 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines2 suggest follow-up radiography after approximately 8 weeks. On the other hand, the 2007 Infectious Disease Society of America and the American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines3 do not mention any follow-up chest radiography in the management of CAPs. More detailed guidelines on follow-up imaging are conspicuous by their absence. Consequently, physicians are left with their clinical judgment and patchy guidelines when they need to decide who the patients meriting future chest imaging are. To address this void in the management of community acquired pneumonias, we have embarked on this retrospective study where our aims were twofold. Firstly, are patients over the age of 50 diagnosed with a community acquired pneumonia really being followed-up, as suggested by the BTS guidelines, and if not, why? Secondly, is this practice really feasible and efficient? Using this strategy, what is the diagnostic yield of lung malignancy and is the diagnosis being achieved early enough? Methodology In this retrospective study, we considered patients 50 years old or over who presented to Mater Dei Hospital, Gozo General Hospital and Maltese Health Centres with radiological findings of a pneumonia. The age 50 was chosen since the The 2009 British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines1 on Community Acquired Pneumonias actually consider patients over the age of 50 to be at high risk for lung malignancy when recommending repeat chest imaging. Patients were recruited by searching for the keywords “consolidation”, “pneumonia” and “opacification” in the radiologist reports for all the radiographs done in the months of January during the years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 and the months of August in the years 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. These reports were obtained using the local Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) software used in all Maltese state hospitals and health centres. The patients whose reports had one or more of these keywords were then sieved through according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria as mentioned in Tables 1 and 2.
| Inclusion Criteria |
| Patients whose chest radiographs’ reports contained the search words “consolidation”, “opacification” and/or “pneumonia” |
| Age: 50 years or over |
| Consolidation must be seen on chest radiograph |
| Patients presenting in the months of January 2013-2017 |
| Patients presenting in the months of August 2013-2016 |
| Chest X-rays performed in Mater Dei Hospital, Gozo General Hospital and Maltese Health Centres |
| Exclusion Criteria |
| Patients under the age of 50 |
| Patients who had chest imaging other than chest radiographs done in the first week after the initial chest X-ray |
| Patients deceased within 12 weeks of initial chest radiographs |
| Hospital Acquired Pneumonias, i.e. patients who had been admitted in hospital at any stage during the three weeks prior to presentation |
| Chest radiographs that were never formally reported |
| Lesion described on chest x-ray was already identified in previous imaging |
| Patients with pleural effusions that required drainage |
| Lung transplant patients |
| Patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis |
| Patients who did not have a fixed address in Malta (thus potentially making follow-up less likely) |
| Chest X-rays done over 24 hours after admission if no CXR was performed on admission |
| Presenting CXRs where the reporting radiologist recommended cross-sectional imaging and/or bronchoscopy and/or PET scans due to a high index of suspicion for a lung malignancy |
| Number of Patients (n) | 402 |
| Number of Males | 207 |
| Patients over 80 years old | 143 |
| Patients 50-80 years olds | 259 |
| Patients requiring admission | 316 |
| Follow-up imaging done (within 12 weeks) | 214 |
| % Follow-up done imaging within 12 weeks | 53.2% |
| Follow-up Recommended by Radiologist | 130 |
| Follow-up done after Radiologist Recommendation (within 12 weeks) | 76 |
| % 12 week follow-up rate after Radiologist Recommendation | 58.5% |
| 12 week follow-up in patients over 80 years old | 73 |
| % 12-week follow up in patients over 80 years old | 51.0% |
| 12 week follow-up in patients 50-80 years old | 141 |
| % 12-week follow up in patients 50-80 years old | 54.4% |
| Number of males with a follow-up chest imaging within 12 weeks | 110 |
| %12-week follow up in males | 53.1% |
| Number of females with a follow-up chest imaging within 12 weeks | 104 |
| %12-week follow up in females | 53.3% |
| Lung malignancy cases diagnosed on follow-up of non-resolving lesions | 7 |
| % diagnostic yield on follow-up (i.e. number of patients diagnosed with lung malignancy compared to total number - n) | 1.74% |
| % of followed-up patients diagnosed with lung malignancy | 3.27% |
| Chest imaging done within 12 months | 320 |
| % of cases having chest imaging done within 12 months | 79.6% |
| Lung malignancy cases diagnosed within 12 months | 8 |
| % potential diagnostic yield (as identified by looking at all imaging done within 12 months) | 1.99% |
| Januaries 2013-2017 | Augusts 2013-2016 | |
| Number of Patients (n) | 270 | 132 |
| Number of Males | 133 | 74 |
| Patients over 80 years old | 96 | 47 |
| Patients 50-80 years olds | 174 | 85 |
| Follow-up imaging done (within 12 weeks) | 147 | 67 |
| % Follow-up done imaging within 12 weeks | 54.4% | 50.8% |
| Patients requiring admission | 215 | 101 |
| Follow-up done in admitted patients (within 12 weeks) | 114 | 53 |
| % 12 week follow-up rate in admitted patients | 53.0% | 52.5% |
| Follow-up Recommended by Radiologist | 98 | 32 |
| Follow-up done after Radiologist Recommendation (within 12 weeks) | 59 | 17 |
| % 12 week follow-up rate after Radiologist Recommendation | 60.2% | 53.1% |
| 12 week follow-up in patients over 80 years old | 46 | 27 |
| % 12-week follow up in patients over 80 years old | 47.9% | 57.4% |
| 12 week follow-up in patients 50-80 years old | 101 | 40 |
| % 12-week follow up in patients 50-80 years old | 58.0% | 47.1% |
| Number of males with a follow-up chest imaging within 12 weeks | 72 | 38 |
| %12-week follow up in males | 54.1% | 51.4% |
| Number of females with a follow-up chest imaging within 12 weeks | 75 | 29 |
| %12-week follow up in females | 54.7% | 50.0% |
| Lung malignancy cases diagnosed on follow-up of non-resolving lesions | 4 | 3 |
| % diagnostic yield on follow-up (i.e. number of patients diagnosed with lung malignancy compared to total number - n) | 1.48% | 2.27% |
| % of followed-up patients diagnosed with lung malignancy | 2.72% | 4.48% |
| Chest imaging done within 12 months | 217 | 103 |
| % of cases having chest imaging done within 12 months | 80.4% | 78.0% |
| Lung malignancy cases diagnosed within 12 months | 5 | 3 |
| % potential diagnostic yield (as identified by looking at all imaging done within 12 months) | 1.85% | 2.27% |
Figure
Test image
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Editorial Board retains the copyright of all material published in the Malta Medical School Gazette. Any reprint in any form of any part will require permission from the Editorial Board. Material submitted to the Editorial Board will not be returned, unless specifically requested.